<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Guidelines |</title><link>https://albarqouni.github.io/tags/guidelines/</link><atom:link href="https://albarqouni.github.io/tags/guidelines/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><description>Guidelines</description><generator>HugoBlox Kit (https://hugoblox.com)</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>FUTURE-AI: International guidelines for trustworthy medical AI</title><link>https://albarqouni.github.io/projects/future-ai/</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://albarqouni.github.io/projects/future-ai/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Despite major advances, few AI tools for medical imaging and healthcare have been adopted in clinical practice, partly because of concerns about their robustness, fairness, transparency and accountability. &lt;strong&gt;FUTURE-AI&lt;/strong&gt; set out to give developers, evaluators, clinicians and regulators a shared, actionable answer to the question: &lt;em&gt;what makes a medical AI tool trustworthy and deployable?&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h3 id="the-consortium"&gt;The consortium&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The FUTURE-AI Consortium was founded in 2021 from five European imaging projects of the AI for Health Imaging (AI4HI) network — EuCanImage, ProCAncer-I, CHAIMELEON, PRIMAGE and INCISIVE — and grew into an international, interdisciplinary group of &lt;strong&gt;117 experts from 50 countries&lt;/strong&gt; on all continents: AI scientists, clinicians and clinical researchers, biomedical ethicists, social scientists, legal experts and data managers. The guideline was developed over &lt;strong&gt;24 months&lt;/strong&gt; with a modified Delphi approach: six working groups drafted definitions and initial best practices for each principle, which then went through &lt;strong&gt;eight rounds&lt;/strong&gt; of surveys, feedback and online consensus meetings.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h3 id="objectives"&gt;Objectives&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Define widely accepted &lt;strong&gt;guiding principles&lt;/strong&gt; for trustworthy AI in healthcare.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Translate them into &lt;strong&gt;concrete, actionable best practices&lt;/strong&gt; that cover the entire lifecycle — design, development, validation, regulation, deployment and monitoring.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Provide a &lt;strong&gt;dynamic framework&lt;/strong&gt; that can evolve with the technology, regulation and stakeholder feedback.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;h3 id="principles-and-recommendations"&gt;Principles and recommendations&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;p&gt;FUTURE-AI rests on six principles — &lt;strong&gt;F&lt;/strong&gt;airness, &lt;strong&gt;U&lt;/strong&gt;niversality, &lt;strong&gt;T&lt;/strong&gt;raceability, &lt;strong&gt;U&lt;/strong&gt;sability, &lt;strong&gt;R&lt;/strong&gt;obustness and &lt;strong&gt;E&lt;/strong&gt;xplainability — operationalised in &lt;strong&gt;30 best practices&lt;/strong&gt; that address technical, clinical, socio-ethical and legal dimensions. Among them:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Fairness:&lt;/strong&gt; define potential sources of bias from an early stage, collect information on individual and data attributes, and evaluate biases and correction measures.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Universality:&lt;/strong&gt; define the intended clinical settings, use community-defined standards, evaluate on external datasets and multiple sites, and demonstrate local clinical validity.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Traceability:&lt;/strong&gt; implement a risk-management process throughout the lifecycle, documentation, quality control of inputs and outputs, periodic auditing and updating, usage logging and AI governance.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Usability:&lt;/strong&gt; define intended use and user requirements early, establish human–AI interaction and oversight, provide training, and evaluate user acceptance and clinical utility and safety.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Robustness:&lt;/strong&gt; define sources of data variation early, train with representative real-world data, and evaluate robustness against real-world variations.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Explainability:&lt;/strong&gt; define the need for explanations with end users and evaluate them with end users.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Seven general recommendations apply across all principles: engage interdisciplinary stakeholders throughout the lifecycle, protect data privacy and security, address identified AI risks, define an adequate evaluation plan, comply with AI regulations, and investigate application-specific ethical as well as social and environmental issues.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h3 id="our-role"&gt;Our role&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Shadi Albarqouni took part as a &lt;strong&gt;member of the FUTURE-AI Consortium&lt;/strong&gt;, contributing to the consensus process and co-authoring the guideline (
); the initiative itself was led by Karim Lekadir (University of Barcelona). The principles — in particular robustness, fairness and universality across sites — closely match the lab&amp;rsquo;s work on federated and affordable AI and inform how we design and validate our own tools.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>